Night Stalker review: This true crime series is neither tasteful nor compelling – The Independent
Independent Culture Newsletter.
The finest in film, music TELEVISION & & radio straight to your inbox each week.
Night Stalkers fundamental defect is a lack of function. Its too meretricious to qualify as a “severe” documentary– it does not inform you all that much that a trawl through Wikipedia could not– however its subject is too dark and depraved to qualify as light home entertainment. Leave aside the ominous tone and category cliches, and youre entrusted to not all that much: no exploration of evil, simply a rote itinerising of it.
Independent Culture Newsletter.
The best in film, music TELEVISION & & radio directly to your inbox each week.
It takes place within every brand-new entry in the vogueish real crime genre, the most abhorrent and lurid acts an apparent fit for the framework of pop home entertainment. Reveals such as Making a Murderer or Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes have been big hits for Netflix, exhuming old criminal offenses and rebuilding them with a systematic writers style. Night Stalker: The Hunt for a Serial Killer shows up today on Netflix bearing all the hallmarks of a modern-day real crime feeling– however makes for neither classy nor particularly engaging seeing.
Too much time is invested focused on the boring accurate minutiae of the investigation, like the telltale footprints Ramirez unintentionally left at the scenes of his criminal activities.
The entire documentary would maybe have actually been much better condensed into the length of a feature. Excessive time is spent fixated on the bland accurate minutiae of the investigation, like the tell-tale footprints Ramirez unintentionally left at the scenes of his criminal offenses. While the interviews are considerate and dry enough, theyre punctuated by queasy flashes of design– CGI entertainments of blood-spattered bodies or a close-up of a cooking area knife plunging into a spurting wound.
Learn more.
Mistakes were made throughout the examination, many glaringly when previous San Francisco mayor Dianne Feinstein (now a senator) almost jeopardised the investigation in 1985 by revealing a crucial piece of evidence in a press conference. This is provided a couple of minutes throughout one of Night Stalkers four episodes, however otherwise the examinations drawbacks are left relatively unprobed.
Shows such as Making a Murderer or Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes have actually been substantial hits for Netflix, exhuming old crimes and rebuilding them with a systematic writers flair. Night Stalker: The Hunt for a Serial Killer gets here today on Netflix bearing all the hallmarks of a modern real crime sensation– but makes for neither especially engaging nor classy viewing.
The “Night Stalker” was the name given by contemporary news outlets to Richard Ramirez, a Texan guy who performed a spree of murders, sexual attacks and thefts in California in the mid-1980s. Ramirezs criminal activities were brazen, evil and ready-made for media sensationalism: he utilized a variety of weapons such as hammers and machetes to attack, eliminate and sometimes abuse his victims, who varied from young kids to the elderly. Night Stalker, directed by Tiller Russell, is primarily preoccupied with the hunt for Ramirez, rather than the killer himself, strolling viewers through the authorities investigation through substantial interviews with some of his surviving victims and the investigators directing the case..