Meghan Markle’s heartbroken dad Thomas says ‘I love you’ letter claim is a ‘total lie’ – The Sun

HEARTBROKEN Thomas Markle says daughter Meghan spurned him in a controversial letter which “indicated completion of our relationship”.

She is stated to have composed the “unpleasant” note, at the centre of a High Court battle, to her dad after they reached “breaking point”.

⚠ Read our Meghan Markle and Prince Harry live blog site for the latest news on the Royal couple

He says: “It appeared to me that the short article had actually either been expressly authorised by Meg or she had at the extremely least recognized about and authorized of its publication.

The interview with five of the Duchess of Sussexs “friends” said “heartbroken” Meghan had composed “I love you” and begged for him to stop “victimising” her in the Press.

Her furious father states: “When I read the article The Truth About Meghan in People magazine I was surprised by what it said about me. It was an overall lie.

In a witness declaration, Thomas, 76, states: “The letter didnt say she loved me. It showed no concern about the truth I had suffered a cardiovascular disease.”

” It misrepresented the tone and content of the letter Meg had actually composed me in August 2018. I rapidly decided I desired to remedy that misrepresentation.”

As an outcome, Thomas, 76, passed the letter to the Mail on Sunday.

Meghan, 39, is suing over the publication of letter extracts.

” I believed (and still believe) that Meghan wanted her account of the letter to be published.”


Thomas Markle claims his child never ever said she loved him in her explosive letterCredit: Refer to Caption

” It showed no concern about the truth I had actually suffered a cardiac arrest and asked no questions about my health.

Thomas says: “The letter didnt state she liked me. It did not even ask how I was.

He has actually not spoken to Meghan because before she got wed to Prince Harry in May 2018.

She posted the letter by FedEx 3 months after Thomas suffered a cardiovascular disease that left him not able to make the Windsor wedding event.

Her legal representative Justin Rushbrooke, QC, today explained the 1,250-word letter as “a sincere plea from an anguished daughter to her dad”.

” It really signalled the end of our relationship, not a reconciliation.”

In his statement released by the High Court, Thomas, of Rosario, California, states: “The letter was not an attempt at a reconciliation. It was a criticism of me.”

Meghan, 39, is now suing in the High Court for breaches of privacy, data defense and copyright after extracts were published in 2019.


The papa knocked People for suggesting he was to blame for completion of the relationship with his daughterCredit: Rex Features

They confess she spoke to two friends about the contents of the letter, who then spoke to the mag without her approval.

Her legal representatives deny she had any knowledge her buddies were speaking with People.

Thomas statement says: “It appeared to me she should have used these buddies to pass details to the Press, info that she desired published, including information about the letter she had clearly informed them she had written.”

Thomas adds: “The short article likewise referred to my letter back to Meg which only she would have learnt about.”

The retired Emmy Award-winning lighting engineer claims the publication “misrepresented” his written reply to the letter requesting for an image chance for the media.

Thomas signed 1,300-word witness declaration, dated March 2020, states the recommendation that Meghan had actually “connected” to fix their relationship was “incorrect”.


Harry and Meghan are presently residing in LA after going back from royal dutiesCredit: PA: Press Association/PA Images

He insists: “Until I check out the article in People magazine I had actually never planned to talk publicly about Megs letter to me.”

He mentions: “It was incorrect for People publication to state I had lied about Meg shutting me out– she had shut me out, as the letter from her revealed.”

Thomas says claims in the post that he was at fault for them not speaking were “false”.

And he writes: “I had actually repeatedly attempted to reach her after the wedding however I could not find a way of getting her to speak to me.”

In his declaration, Thomas states the story was “incorrect and unjust” when it claimed Meghan had been economically supporting her daddy.

Thomas also states the interviews with Megs “inner circle” of buddies was incorrect for suggesting that he and his child Samantha had spoken “mistruths”.

He adds: “I had actually recommended a photo of Meg and me together, as I believed an image showing we remained in a harmonious relationship would make journalism withdraw.”


If the case goes on, both Thomas Markle and Meghan might take to the stand in the prominent trialCredit: Refer to Caption

Thomas has promised to be a witness at any trial– currently set for October.

He never received any payment for the story, his statement states. He includes: “It was essential to me in setting the record directly.”

Exposing his reason for sharing extracts, he states: “Readers had to see the letter for themselves– then they would know they were getting the truth.”

Meghans legal representatives argue that the publication of an “inherently private, individual and sensitive” letter was a “plain and serious intrusion” of her privacy.

After reading the story he declined all interview demands and rather looked for a Mail on Sunday reporter, he claims.


Meghans lawyers looked for a summary judgment to be bied far, which would swerve the need for a trial and witnessesCredit: Rex Features

NOT FINEMotorists might be hit with ₤ 70 fines for 20 minor driving errors under brand-new plans


THE EASTER ESCAPEBoris Johnson begins leading secret planning to reduce UK lockdown at Easter

SHOT IN THE ARMDaily Covid vaccine figures drop by almost HALF in previous 4 days

MUTANT FEARGermany discovers ANOTHER Covid stress different to UK & & South African variants

DEADLIEST DAYUK Covid deaths up 1,610 in biggest increase because pandemic began

SILENCEDWuhan physicians confess China lied to world so millions might celebrate New Year

The case continues.

Meghan could likewise be asked to give evidence together with Royal Household personnel who worked beside her and Harry before Megxit.

A two-day remote hearing in front of Justice Warby began yesterday.

Megxit was the most significant sellout in royal history with Meghan Markle and Prince Harry devastating for the family, expert claims

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *